Category: Judiciary

  • 2 arraigned for allegedly stealing phones

    2 arraigned for allegedly stealing phones

    Phones
    By Chidinma Ewunonu-Aluko
    Ibadan, June 5, 2024(NAN) Two men – Ezekiel Abiodun, 34 and Abiola Amoo, 43, on Wednesday appeared before an Iyaganku Magistrates’ Court, Ibadan for allegedly stealing cell phones.
    The duo of no fixed addresses, were charged with stealing and receiving stolen property, to which they pleaded not guilty.
    The prosecutor, Insp Olusegun Adegboye, told the court that the defendants allegedly committed the offences on May 29, at Sanyo area, Ibadan.
    Adegboye alleged that Abiodun stole Infinix phone worth N177, 000 and another phone worth N28,000 belonging to one Taiwo Salami.
    He said that Amoo on the same day received the stolen phones from Abiodun, knowing same to have been stolen.
    He said the offences contravened Sections 399(9) and 427 of the Criminal Laws of Oyo State, 2000.
    Magistrate Sofia Babalola granted the defendants bail in the sum of N250, 000 each and two sureties each in like sum.
    She adjourned the case until June 11 for hearing. (NAN) (www.nannews.ng)
    CC/FAT/IKU
    =========
    Edited by Fatima Sule Abdullahi/Tayo Ikujuni

  • Estate agent docked over alleged N430,000 fraud

    Fraud

    By Chidinma Ewunonu-Aluko

    Ibadan, June 5, 2024(NAN) A 52-year old estate agent, Johnbosco Dauda, was on Wednesday arraigned before a Grade ‘A’ Customary Court, Ibadan, over an alleged N430,000 fraud.

    Dauda whose address was not given, is being charged with stealing and obtaining money under false pretence.

    The Prosecutor, Mr Philip Amusan told the court that the defendant committed the offence on May 6, at the Sango area of Ibadan.

    Amusan said that Dauda collected the money from the complainant, Ifeanyi Nnabuike, with the pretext of leasing a three-bedroom flat for him.

    The prosecutor said that the defended converted the money to his personal use.

    He said that the offences contravened Sections 419 and 399(9) of the Criminal Laws of Oyo, 2000.

    The Court President, Mrs Sukurat Yusuf, granted the defendant bail in the sum of N300,000 with two sureties in like sum.

    She adjourned the case until July 3, for hearing.(NAN)(www.nannews.ng)

    CC/DCO/AZU

    ==========

    Edited by Deborah Coker and Azubuike Okeh

  • Naira Abuse: Court hears case against Cubana Chief Priest, June 25

    Naira Abuse: Court hears case against Cubana Chief Priest, June 25

    Adjournment
    By Sandra Umeh
    Lagos, June 5, 2024 (NAN) A Federal High Court in Lagos on Wednesday, further adjourned until June 25 for mention a case against celebrity bartender,  Pascal Okechukwu (Cubana Chief Priest) for alleged abuse of the Naira.

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), arraigned Okechukwu on April 17, on a three-count charge of allegedly spraying and tampering with the Naira notes during a social event at the Eko hotel in Lagos.

    He had pleaded not guilty to the charge and was granted bail in the sum of N10 million.

    At the last adjourned date on May 2, the defence counsel, Mr Chikaosolu Ojukwu (SAN), had informed the court that parties were exploring settlement and had applied that the matter be settled pursuant to the provisions of section 14(2) of the EFCC Act.

    Following the position, defence counsel had then applied for a withdrawal of the preliminary objection, and since there was no objection from the prosecution, the court granted same.

    The court had consequently, adjourned the case until June 5, (today) for report of settlement.

    However on Wednesday, newsmen learnt that the defence had written a letter seeking an adjournment of the case.

    The case has now been fixed for June 25 for mention.

    In the charge, the defendant was said to have tampered with the funds in the denomination of N500, while dancing at the social event in Eko hotel.

    The offence contravenes the provisions of section 21(1) of the Central Bank Act of 2007.(NAN)

    UNS/DCO/SH
    =========

    Edited by Deborah Coker/Sadiya Hamza

  • Court sentences housewife to death for murdering her ex- husband

    Court sentences housewife to death for murdering her  ex- husband

    Sentence
    By Ibrahim Bello
    Birnin Kebbi, June 3, 2024 (NAN) A High Court in  Birnin Kebbi on Monday sentenced a woman, Farida Abubakar to death by hanging for killing her former husband, Chief Magistrate, Attahiru Muhammad-Ibrahim.
    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports Abubbakat was arraigned before the court for murder on Aug. 25, 2022 while the main charge was filed on July 26, 2023.
    The prosecution said that the convict stabbed chief magistrate Muhammad-Ibrahim with sa sharp object on his abdomen, neck and left arm which led to his death .
    Delivering judgment, the Chief Judge of the state, who adjudicated on the case, Justice Umar Abubakar held that the court was convinced that the accused person based on the evidence adduced by the prosecution.
    “The defendant was last seen with the deceased in his house in Birnin Kebbi, shortly after, he was found dead.
    “Circumstantial evidence linked the defendant to the offence.
    “The burden of proof is on the prosecution to establish guilt against the accused person beyond reasonable doubt within the boundary of evidence adduced.
    “With the extra judicial statement of the accused person and the testimony of 12 prosecution witnesses, the court is overwhelming convinced that the circumstantial evidence is an irresistible fact that she was the one who killed the deceased.
    “The evidence adduced is cogent, compelling, not controverted.
    ” Her Hijab was found smeared with blood. It was her intention to kill him. She knew death will  be the consequences of her action. The offence committed at a time the deceased was about to marry a new wife.
    “The court is satisfied, it is clearly established that the defendant mercilessly planned and marshalled the attack with sharp object, obviously to cause death or knowing the consequence of her act to cause death or does not care.
    “The court has found you guilty of culpable homicide and bodily harm, the court has convicted you as charged.
    “The court has sentenced you to death by hanging in accordance with section 191(b) penal code law of Kebbi State. You are to be hanged by the neck until you are dead.
    “The court has also sentenced you to seven years in prison for causing bodily harm in accordance with section 224 (1) of penal code law of Kebbi State,” the Judge read out in the judgment.
    In mitigation, the defence counsel, Mudashiru Sani, holding brief for Abdulnasir Sallau, described the convict as first time offender with aged parents.
    The counsel said that the convict was her parents’ caregiver and also has a young daughter in need of motherly care.
    He pleaded with the court to give the convict lighter sentence, so that she could finish her time and come back to the society as reformed individual, considering her age.
    In reply, the Prosecuting Counsel, who is the Director, Public Prosecution in the state Ministry of Justice, Lawal Hudu-Garba, enjoined the court to follow the latter of the law to serve as deterrent to others from committing the same heinous offence.
    Shortly after the judgment, the defence counsel, Sani, said, his client would appeal the verdict. (NAN).
    IBI/SH
    ======
    edited by Sadiya Hamza
  • Strike: Judiciary workers shut Lagos courts

    Strike

    By Adenike Ayodele/Sandra Umeh
    Ikeja, June 3, 2024 (NAN) The major gates to the Ikeja High Court have been shut due to the nationwide industrial action by the Nigeria Labour Congress (NLC) and the Trade Union Congress (TUC).
    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the gates were shut on Monday by the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), Ikeja Branch.
    NAN correspondents, who monitored the development in Lagos, observed that lawyers and litigants were turned back from entering the court premises.
    The strike enforcers urged those who tried to gain entrance into the court premises to comply with the order.
    The courts were shut in strict compliance with JUSUN’s order.
    It would recalled that JUSUN on June 1 notified its members on mobilisation for the indefinite nationwide industrial action due to inconclusive decision on the new minimum wage.
    The Acting General Secretary of JUSUN, Comrade M.J. Akwashiki, in a press statement said the strike action would start midnight on Sunday.
    Akwashiki said that all branches of the unions were expected to ensure strict compliance to the directive.
    “All vice president of our great unions are to monitor their respective zones to ensure compliance with total shut down of all courts and judicial institutes across Nigeria.
    “The nationwide strike is to ensure government agree on a new national minimum wage and subsequently pass it into law.
    “And to reverse the hike in electricity tariff without consulting the stakeholders as required by the law to N225/kwh back  to N66/kwh,” he said.
    Also, the gates of the Federal High Court Lagos was shut following the strike.
    There was also absence of various staff buses conveying staff to courts.
    NAN gathered that an instruction had been issued earlier directing all staff buses to be put on hold due to the strike.
    Meanwhile, some court officials who came to court were forced to return home in compliance with the industrial action.
    In the same vein, a NAN correspondent who visited the Ojo Magistrates’ Court, reports that there was no activity at the court.
    NAN correspondent observed that
    the gate of the courthouse was closed .

    It was gathered that the court rooms would remain locked until further notice. (NAN)
    OAR/UNS/JNC
    =============
    Edited by Chinyere Joel-Nwokeoma

  • Senior advocate lauds Tinubu for establishing evaluation standards for Ministers

    Senior advocate lauds Tinubu for establishing evaluation standards for Ministers

     

     

    Standard

    By Ebere Agozie

    Abuja, June 3, 2024 (NAN) A Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN) ,Mr Mohammed Ndarani , has commended President Bola Tinubu for establishing the evaluation standards for the assessment of his minsters.

    Ndarani said this in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria on Monday while reacting to the recent event of presentation of ministerial scorecards demanded by President Bola Tinubu.

    He urged strict adherence to them for the good of their ministries, and also for the people of Nigeria as a whole.

    “It is only proper that to whom much is entrusted, much is expected, which means that these assessments would in addition keep political appointees on their toes.

    “Article 19[1]2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provides a guide for the assessment of ministers and other federal appointees.

    “The assessment will help the public to also track the performances of these minsters and know when and how to hold them accountable’’.

    He recalled that Tinubu had instructed 47 ministers to present their performance scorecards ahead of his administration’s one-year in office.

    Ndarani also commended Tinubu for mandating no fewer than 140 officials to track and assess the performance of all federal ministries, departments, and agencies ahead of the first assessment exercise.

    He noted that although some ministers might have embarked on extensive media hype with little to show in real achievement, much might not have be heard of others, who may have performed well.

    “Sometimes, it is not the people that you hear of who are the performers in this country, so, nobody can evaluate any minister other than members of the public,’’ he stated.

    “They are the ones who would have felt the impact of the ministers’ actions, or the lack thereof’’.

    He equally urged the president to consider Section 14[1], 2[a] [c] of the constitution to serve as the foundation during the next ministers’ assessments.

    “Section 14[1], 2[a] [c] of the 1999 Constitution says, ‘(a) sovereignty belongs to the people of Nigeria from whom government through this Constitution derives all its powers and authority; (c) the participation by the people in their government shall be ensured in it.

    “In the light of the above, it is desirable that citizens’ opinion and assessment is considered, in order to get an accurate rating of the ministers.

    “There should be modalities for the assessments, key performance indicators and the reporting mechanisms made available for the public to participate in the exercise’’.

    He said that while a few ministers have performed well, others are still learning on the job.

    Ndarani suggested that allowing only ministers to evaluate their own performance undermines the objectivity of the assessment as a minister cannot be the judge in his own case.

    “We know that sometimes highly placed public officers operate under serious constraints with several factors in play, which revolve around a paucity of funds.

    “Nonetheless, the ministers alone cannot be left to make their own assessments, as this would negate the principle of ‘Nemo judex in causa sua’, which simply says that one cannot be a judge in his own cause.

    “A scorecard where only the ministers assess themselves and score themselves might be a watered-down exercise which could raise questions as to the objectivity of the assessment.

    “There should be an avenue, a mechanism or a survey put in place where people can vote or voice their opinions on the performances of ministers, or public officers, generally.

    “Nigerians should be given a voice in the ministers’ assessments since this will improve the outcomes, and bring them into compliance with global best practices. (NAN)

    EPA/SH

    ======

    edited by Sadiya Hamza

  • Judiciary workers lock out judges, lawyers, others as NLC, TUC begin strike

    Judiciary workers lock out judges, lawyers, others as NLC, TUC begin strike

    Strike

    By Taiye Agbaje

    The Federal High Court, Abuja gate under lock as a result of NLC and TUC strike on Monday

    Abuja, June 3, 2024 (NAN) Members of the Judiciary Staff Union of Nigeria (JUSUN), on Monday, locked out judges, lawyers, staff and litigants from accessing courts in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) in compliance with the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) and Trade Union Congress (TUC)’s directive.

    The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN)’s check at the FCT High Court, Maitama; Federal High Court (FHC); Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court, showed that court activities were totally paralysed as JUSUN members positioned themselves outside the heavily locked gates.

    At Federal High Court, Abuja

    Private security guards and few police officers were also sighted around the court gates as lawyers, litigants, visitors, including journalists, were not allowed entry into the courts’ premises.

    Comrade Samuel Ikpatt, Chairman of the FHC Chapter of JUSUN, in an interview with NAN, said the union was in total compliance with the directive of the NLC that workers should down tool beginning from today.

    “We are the affiliate of NLC. So we are in total compliance with the strike action, including all our divisions,” he said.

    According to him, no court is sitting.

    When asked if lawyers are being allowed to gain access into the high-rise building, he said: “There is nobody inside the courts because we are in total compliance with the directive.”

    On when the gate would be opened, Ikpatt said: “Until when we get directive from our parent body, which is tye NLC.”

    Also speaking, Comrade Mohammed Danjuma-Yusuf, who is the Treasurer of JUSUN Chapter of Court of Appeal, told NAN that they were complying with the NLC’s directive.

    “So Court of Appeal is in total shutdown; 100 per cent compliance. All the 20 branches of Court of Appeal is in total shutdown.

    “Nobody is allowed in, even judges,” he said.

    Danjuma-Yusuf said the gate would be opened when the union received a directive from the national headquarters of NLC.

    NAN reports that the NLC and TUC had, on May 31, declared an indefinite strike, beginning from today, June 3.

    The organised labour decided to embark on industrial action after the negotiations between them and the government over the minimum wage of workers was deadlock.(NAN)(mannews.ng)

    TOA/SH

    =======
    edited by Sadiya Hamza

  • Why divorce should not be liberalised – lawyer

     

     

    Why divorce should not be liberalised – lawyer

     

    Divorce

    By Ngozi Njoku

    Lagos, June 2, 2024 (NAN) A Lagos-based lawyer, Mr Kehinde Nubi, says granting divorce  in marriages that can still be saved is not in the interest of the society.

    Nubi, Principal Partner at Kehinde Nubi and Associates, said in Lagos on Sunday that marriage remained one of the strongest institutions of  the society and should be handled with seriousness. 

    He spoke in an interview with the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN).

    He reacted to  a speculation that prolonged divorce proceedings can frustrate estranged spouses and make one to kill the other.

    According to him, if divorce is liberalised,  many couples might not bother to work on their marriages.

    “This is like undermining the foundation of the society, and I am not in accord with that.

    “The society needs to err on the side of caution by ensuring that only marriages that have broken down irretrievably would be dissolved,” the lawyer said.

    He said that it was important to give room for reconciliation of estranged spouses.

    According to Nubi,  Section 30(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act provides that proceedings for a decree of dissolution of marriage shall not be instituted within two years of the marriage, except by leave of the court.

    “This is to ensure that it is only marriages which have really broken down irretrievably that get to the courts for dissolution.

    “Once proceedings start, in less than a year, one can get a divorce especially where both parties decide not to go the contentious divorce route.

    “I do not agree that it is the length of time it takes to get divorce that is responsible for  couples killing themselves in difficult marriages.

    “I think couples that end up killing themselves because their marriages have broken down are not likely to be those in court because those ones have expectations that the marriage will soon be over.

    “It is most likely those who feel trapped and frustrated in the marriage that can consider such evil thoughts,” Nubi said.

    Another Lagos-based lawyer, Mr Alozie Nwoke, also said that prolonged divorce proceedings  did  not provide room for a spouse  to the other.

    He told NAN  that a spouse killing  the other was not a common feature in divorce proceedings.

     

    “Before the matter gets to court, the parties would have lived apart from each other for at least two years.

    “This way, there is limited contact by the parties,” Nwoke, of the  Alozie Nwoke & Co. Legal Practitioners, Ikeja, said. 

    He said, however,  that the parties might get frustrated in the event of delay in the divorce proceedings.

    “Lawyers take time to ensure that factors that lead to delays are dealt with so as to limit fraistration in divorce matters but killing each other out of frustration is not a common feature and may only occur in extreme situations,” he said.

     

    The lawyer said that delay in disposing of cases in Nigerian courts was not peculiar to divorce suits.

    “Be that as it may, divorce proceedings are not always  long, but there are some common causes of delays during divorce proceedings.

    “Divorce entails parties reaching agreements on the terms of the divorce. Where this is not in place, there will likely be delays in the  matter.

    “Agreements ought to be  reached by spouses on crucial issues such as  custody of children, child support and spousal support, property ownership and asset division,” Nwoke said.   

    According to him, contested divorces tend to take longer to resolve than uncontested ones.

    “Parties in a divorce suit can agree on the terms of their divorce, and in this case, their matter will be uncontested; otherwise, the matter will be contested, and that may lead to a delayed and lengthy court process.

    “There are many contentious areas in a divorce proceedings that can lead to delays and therefore frustrate parties  from getting through the legal process quickly.

    “Unresolved disputes over the terms of a divorce will also extend settlement efforts; so, if a divorce suit is a complex one, it is likely to go on for a longer time than expected.

     

    “Where a  spouse refuses to co-operate by failing to provide required documentation and/or  refuses to attend the divorce proceedings or hearing in court,  it will delay prosecution of the matter,” he said.

    Nwoke added that where one party still had hope of  reconciliation, it could cause  delay in divorce proceedings.

    “Even when a marriage is said to  be broken irretrievably, one party to the proceedings may still feel as though the marriage can be repaired.

    “Delay will be  obviously unavoidable in this situation.

    “Divorce is sometimes a long and drawn out process when there are issues such as  refusal to  cooperate, assets to be divided and child-related issues,” he said.

    He told NAN that a divorce suit could linger if one of the parties refused not consent to the divorce, adding that long court adjournments could delay disposal of a divorce suit. (NAN) (www.nannews.ng)

    NG/IGO 

    ========

    Edited by Ijeoma Popoola

  • Court, sentiments, responsible for delays in matrimonial cases –Lawyers

    Court, sentiments, responsible for delays in matrimonial cases –Lawyers

    Matrimonial

    By Sandra Umeh

    Lagos, June 2, 2024 (NAN) Some Lawyers in Lagos have attributed the delays in deciding matrimonial disputes to the attitude of the courts and sentiments of society to divorce.

    The lawyers told the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) that litigation on marital disputes just like other forms of civil or criminal cases, were faced with a common problem of delay.

    They, however, noted that the peculiar delays in matrimonial proceedings, were due to the attitude of the courts and sentiments of the society towards divorce.

    In an interview with NAN, convener of the Duty Solicitors Network, Mr Bayo Akinlade, said that one of the reasons for the delays was the traditional belief that marriages were a lifetime commitment.

    He said that because of the belief that ‘marriage is the bedrock of any society’, judicial officers tended to adhere to the norm.

    “The traditional belief is that marriage is the foundation of every society, so, the theory of the judiciary is that, as much as possible, we keep the marriage institution sacred.

    “That is why even in the colonial era we made use of the Received English Law, which rules are similar to the Bible, which admonishes us to keep marriages “for better for worse”.

    “So, you find that some judges are often not disposed to granting divorces, and so, might delay parties with all the procedures in the Marriage Act.

    “In the long run, it becomes difficult to get quick marriage dissolution,” he said.

    Akinlade, however, noted that aside the moral or religious perspective, there was also the general problem of congestion of cases in the court’s docket.

    “In my opinion, once a petitioner is able to meet the requirements in section 15(1)(2) of the Matrimonial Causes Act, then that should take care of the issue.,” he said.

    He also noted that the statute regulating matrimonial causes was an old Act, which provides that before a marriage is dissolved, the parties must have been first separated for at least two years.

    “So, you find that when a petitioner, who wants divorce approaches a lawyer, he is first asked how many years they have  been separated.

    “So, if there has been a separation, the lawyer then advises the petitioner further on the grounds for dissolution; so, you see it is a process,” he said.

    He also highlighted another reason for delays, on the part of the respondents, who often frustrate the cases, even when the party has been served with processes to attend court.

    “So, if it is a man divorcing his wife, the woman, may make herself scarce and unavailable for service of processes and vice versa.

    “Now, if a party is not served with court process, they cannot legally come before court, so, this adds to the delays,” he said.

    Also, the President of the Africa Women Lawyers Association (AWLA), Mrs Amanda Demechi-Asagba, highlighted some peculiarities, which cause delays in divorce cases.

    She told NAN, that divorce cases suffered delays just as other cases in court, however, the first hurdle was to  assign the suit number, and then, the court to try the matter.

    For instance, she said that the Lagos court dockets were “overflowing” with cases, and so, getting divorce matters concluded took “donkey years” unlike states like Ogun, Osun, Nasarawa, where duration was shorter.

    Demechi-Asagba also listed other factors that cause delays in divorce cases to include, service of court papers, entering of appearances. family emotions and stigmatisation of parties in a dissolution tussle.

    “Some of these delays are also caused by emotions that go with divorce, like family intervention and the customary taboos accompanying such cases.

    “There is also the threat to disown especially the daughter, for daring to bring shame to the family, as well as the time it takes to gather the necessary documents to support one’s case.

    “The court processes of compulsory conference, mandatory reconciliation or the mediation before the commencement of trial are also factors which cause delays,” she said.

    Demechi-Asagba also noted that the unwillingness of witnesses to come forward to testify for or against the parties due to family ties, was also a factor that added to the delays.

    She described the restraints on the part of witnesses, as a “defence” so they are not seen as being instrumental to the divorce.

    “In some cases the delays helped the parties to heal and get back together, while in some it escalates the tension, leading to violence and total breakdown,” she said.

    She, however, noted that there was no time frame for dissolution of marriage in court.

    She noted that undue delays in the dispensation of justice was generally not encouraged, because “Justice delayed is justice denied”.

    Also speaking with NAN, the Ogun State Coordinator of the African Women Lawyers Association (AWLA), Mrs Ebere Obiora, noted that delays in the judicial process were not peculiar to divorce cases .

    According to her, parties in divorce proceedings are not expected to stay together, it could be unsafe for them to live under same roof while in court.

    While confirming that delays could arise in  a divorce suit, she also said that counsel to either parties were at liberty to apply to the court, for speedy hearing.

    “Most of the time in the life of a marriage whose dissolution was ongoing, parties do not normally live together.

    “In any case, where parties are still living together and the matter becomes unduly delayed, counsel involved may apply for accelerated hearing of the suit.

    “This is to avoid any of the spouses becoming a victim of circumstances.

    “Meanwhile, I must point out that delays in matrimonial proceedings just as other cases, might occur due to the circumstances of the particular case.

    “Therefore, delays in litigation is not an issue that bothers on cases of marriage dissolution only,” she said.

    Another lawyer, who is a member of the International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA), Mrs Vera Chiweuba, said that issues of delay in proceedings touched on all matters irrespective of its nature.

    “These delays cut across all matters whether marriage cases, criminal or civil, it is infact an issue calling for attention from apex judicial authorities.

    “So, the question should be why is the judiciary so slow; this is a situation from which our courts must purge itself,” she said.

    While noting that some delays maybe due to shortage of judges, Chiweuba urged the judiciary to expedite action in ensuring timely disposal of cases. (NAN)

    UNS/IFY
    ========

    Edited by Ifeyinwa Omowole